Apples to oranges. Or rather, you trying to turn this on it's head by saying that Clinton isn't saying anything wrong while Obama is (what Obama said wasn't praising Reagan, sorry).

What he said is true...if we were running by the Republican rules, Hillary would be ahead (though by the math I read, it'd be about 150 delegate lead or so, not quite 300 or so, what Bill said). But so what? We're not running the primary with the Republican rules. We're running Democratic rules, which however you may feel about them, are different.

What's the purpose of even bringing this up? The only thing I can think of is a possible insinuation that we should change the rules of the primary mid-game, and if that's the intent, he damn well deserves to catch heat over that.

Just because he was a two-term president doesn't mean he's totally infallible.